What''s the Latest on the Raging BPA Debate?

There are concerns about the effects of BPA,found in most baby feeding bottles, on infant health but regulatory agencies in Japan ,Canada, Europe and the United Sates agree that there is no reason to impose a total ban on BPA(Photo @ Olena Abazid Dreamstime.com) NEARLY all experts agree that more studies are needed to determine the toxicological effects of bisphenol A (BPA) on humans. Not that there have been too few studies, but that the results of numerous tests have been contradictory or inconclusive. A number of these findings has led some environmental and consumer groups to call for an outright ban of BPA in containers used for food, whereas some other findings seem to bolster the chemical industry''s allegation that BPA as used today is entirely safe. The issue has even polarized scientists to some extent, and the debate over BPA rages on in mainstream newspapers in the United States as well as in blogs. What is evident is that some "scare factor" is involved in the issue over the effect of BPA as in the somewhat emotion-led campaign to link MMR vaccines to autism, and the generally well-accepted but still controversial decision to ban the use of the artificial sweetener saccharine. This article will not delve into the opinions of pro-BPA industry groups and anti-BPA consumer advocates. Instead it provides a brief on the latest findings on the possible toxicity of this common plastic additive on humans and where regulatory bodies stand on the use of BPA. How Is BPA Used in Food Packaging? BPA is one of the most ubiquitous plastic additives , and is found in such objects as sung lasses , CD cases and plastic storage containers. Bisphenol A is an industrial chemical known as 2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)- propane (C15H16O2 ) used as the starting material for the production of polycarbonate plastics and synthetic resins. Because of its ability to make plastic rigid, BPA is found in polycarbonate containers that come into contact with foodstuffs such as reuseable water bottles, baby bottles, plastic tableware, and microwaveable and storage plastic containers, and residential and office drinking water storage tanks and wine vats. It is also found in the internal epoxy resin coating (lacquer) on cans, including infant formula cans, used for foods and beverages. In some circumstances, chemicals in food packaging can migrate into the food product, and vice versa, depending on the nature of the packaging and the food it contains. "BPA exposure in humans through food contact applications may occur through adult use of food contact articles or infant exposure through maternal transfer, the use of ready made (liquid) infant formula or the use of PC plastic bottles," according to the FDA. In 1988, the Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. introduced a coding system for different types of plastics for the purpose of simplifying the process of sorting and recycling plastic bottles and containers. Plastics identified by codes 1 through 6 do not use BPA in their manufacturing process. Code 7 is used to identify "Other Plastics", of which polycarbonate is one type; however, the majority of code 7 plastics are not polycarbonate. Headlines Cause Concern In September 2008, a study on the effects of the plastic additive on human health again made headlines in the United States. The results of the study likely would have stirred more controversy worldwide if it had not been overtaken by a scandal over another plastic additive, melamine, which unscrupulous traders in China had added to raw milk used to make infant formula and that led to kidney stones or renal failure or both in over 56,000 babies, four of whom died. Higher levels of urinary BPA, a chemical compound commonly used in plastic packaging for food and beverages, is associated with cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and liver-enzyme abnormalities, according to a study1 in the September 17 issue of JAMA. The study was released to coincide with aAir Jordan